You're such a goober, Uber: UK regulators blast hushed breach

MP: Funny, you managed to contact customers when TfL put your licence on hold…

Brit regulators, security agencies and MPs have slammed Uber for covering up the massive data breach of 57 million customer and driver records.

The company – already in hot water in London for its failure to toe the regulatory lines required of a taxi firm – has been widely condemned for concealing the 2016 breach.

The UK's data protection watchdog said that yesterday's revelations about the breach "raises huge concerns around [Uber's] data protection policies and ethics".

Uber has yet to break down the numbers of affected customers on a country-by-country basis – other than to say that 600,000 US drivers' information was leaked – so it isn't clear how many UK employees or customers are at risk.

Deputy information commissioner James Dipple-Johnstone said that if UK citizens had been affected then his organisation "should have been notified so that we could assess and verify the impact on people whose data was exposed".

Deputy Labour leader Tom Watson echoed his concerns about the way the taxi biz handled the breach, saying it raised questions about Uber's "culture and internal practices".

In an open letter to CEO Dara Khosrowshahi, shared on Twitter, Watson lambasted Uber for failing to notify customers, observing that it seems perfectly capable of contacting them when it benefits the biz.

"I note that when Transport for London announced that they would not be renewing Uber's licence to operate... Uber emailed its customers to ask them to protest against this decision on the very same day," Watson wrote.

He also posed a list of questions drilling into who was aware of the breach, in addition to the two employees that have been jettisoned from the firm.

The ICO, the National Crime Agency and the National Security Centre said they were working together to investigate how the breach has affected UK customers.

The agencies pointed out that firms have a duty to 'fess up to breaches so they can work together to tackle the breach and limit the harm to customers.

The ICO also indicated that deliberately concealing breaches "could attract higher fines". Although, as many have noted, the revelation from Uber has come before the EU's new General Data Protection Regulation – and its maximum €20m/£17m fine – kicks in next year.

Uber could not immediately offer any more information on the number of UK users or drivers affected; who was responsible for ensuring Uber complied with UK data protection law at the time of the breach; or when UK regulators and customers would been contacted. ?

Biting the hand that feeds IT ? 1998–2017

<option id="haujiCA"></option>
<tr id="haujiCA"><optgroup id="haujiCA"></optgroup></tr>
<tr id="haujiCA"><optgroup id="haujiCA"></optgroup></tr>
<acronym id="haujiCA"><small id="haujiCA"></small></acronym><tr id="haujiCA"><optgroup id="haujiCA"></optgroup></tr>
<acronym id="haujiCA"></acronym><acronym id="haujiCA"></acronym><rt id="haujiCA"></rt>
<acronym id="haujiCA"><optgroup id="haujiCA"></optgroup></acronym>
<acronym id="haujiCA"></acronym>
<tr id="haujiCA"><optgroup id="haujiCA"></optgroup></tr>
<rt id="haujiCA"></rt>
  • 325735831 2018-01-17
  • 162536830 2018-01-17
  • 48476829 2018-01-17
  • 804110828 2018-01-17
  • 74358827 2018-01-17
  • 613608826 2018-01-17
  • 955358825 2018-01-17
  • 318587824 2018-01-17
  • 196263823 2018-01-17
  • 409554822 2018-01-17
  • 765918821 2018-01-17
  • 179475820 2018-01-17
  • 49709819 2018-01-17
  • 376285818 2018-01-17
  • 299958817 2018-01-17
  • 686135816 2018-01-17
  • 197409815 2018-01-17
  • 734421814 2018-01-17
  • 33320813 2018-01-17
  • 159501812 2018-01-17