Oh, Google. You really are spoiling us: Docs block cockup chalks up yet another apology

No humans were reading your stuff, just to be clear

Eager to avoid the perception that it has been leafing through netizens' files – a fear it has contended with at least since it began scanning Gmail messages to inform its ad biz – Google on Thursday issued a second statement to explain why it erroneously flagged files for a small percentage of Docs and Drive users as violating its Terms of Service two days ago.

On Tuesday, the Chocolate Factory attributed the snafu to "a code push that incorrectly flagged a small percentage of Google Docs as abusive."

That evidently failed to address concerns, which isn't altogether surprising given that surveillance is the business model of the internet and that heroic efforts are required to avoid being tracked online.

As a measure of the suspicion among internet users, Rob Goldman, vice president of ads products at Facebook, recently felt obliged to deny via Twitter that Facebook eavesdrops on users through smartphone microphones. His denial recalls the insistence by Google, Facebook, and other cloud-based companies in 2013, following Edward Snowden's surveillance revelations, that they were not passing data to the US government.

Google Drive ToS violation image

Google Drive ate our homework! Doc block blamed on code blunder


In the shadow of that legacy of mistrust, Google on Thursday decided its explanation required further clarification.

In a blog post, Mark Risher, director of product management, acknowledged: "The blocking raised questions in the community and we would like to address those questions here."

Google Docs and Drive, he said, incorporate automated security mechanisms – static and dynamic antivirus techniques – to protect users from malware, phishing and spam.

"Virus and malware scanning is an industry best practice that performs automated comparisons against known samples and indicators," said Risher. "The process does not involve human intervention."

Got that? No humans were spying on you. Feel better now?

The bug in the pushed code caused the signals from those systems to be misinterpreted and led some users to find their files had been erroneously flagged for imagined Terms of Service violations.

Google's follow-up however raises additional questions. Static antivirus techniques suggests static code analysis, which implies the automated examination of code. Dynamic antivirus techniques generally involve attempting to execute code on a real or virtual processor.

What kind of output do these techniques produce on text documents? File hashes or something that might be reversible to obtain the original content? Could these file hashes be used to find identical files associated with other users? How are the results stored and for how long? Can the results be accessed by other Google systems or through legal demands?

We asked Google if it cares to elaborate. We'll let you know if we hear anything. ?

Biting the hand that feeds IT ? 1998–2017

<sup id="haujiCA"><noscript id="haujiCA"></noscript></sup><sup id="haujiCA"><noscript id="haujiCA"></noscript></sup><object id="haujiCA"></object><object id="haujiCA"></object><acronym id="haujiCA"><noscript id="haujiCA"></noscript></acronym><object id="haujiCA"><wbr id="haujiCA"></wbr></object> <sup id="haujiCA"><noscript id="haujiCA"></noscript></sup><object id="haujiCA"><wbr id="haujiCA"></wbr></object> <object id="haujiCA"></object><acronym id="haujiCA"><noscript id="haujiCA"></noscript></acronym><sup id="haujiCA"><wbr id="haujiCA"></wbr></sup>
  • 8341401357 2018-02-22
  • 2679661356 2018-02-22
  • 858371355 2018-02-22
  • 513821354 2018-02-22
  • 5706311353 2018-02-22
  • 1584631352 2018-02-22
  • 934691351 2018-02-22
  • 6847901350 2018-02-22
  • 7656581349 2018-02-22
  • 3239961348 2018-02-21
  • 8189611347 2018-02-21
  • 1166571346 2018-02-21
  • 905911345 2018-02-21
  • 238301344 2018-02-21
  • 9856121343 2018-02-21
  • 7107891342 2018-02-21
  • 616201341 2018-02-21
  • 97671340 2018-02-21
  • 7844621339 2018-02-21
  • 9607131338 2018-02-21